Hi John, about "integration other index implementation": Sounds like you need a DBMS with some lucene features. There was a post about using lucene in Oracle: http://www.nabble.com/Using-lucene-as-a-database...-good-idea-or-bad-idea--to18703473.html#a18741137 and http://www.nabble.com/Oracle-and-Lucene-Integration-to7501262.html#a7501262
But normaly for a particular problem there is a solution with lucene (example: you should not index timestamps in lucene, but you can A) index year, month and day or B) generate your own filter which used the (cached) timestamp from a stored field or C) use solr (which contains timestamp-range implementation out of the box). Best regards Karsten John Patterson wrote: > > Hi, I know that Lucene uses an inverted index which makes range queries > and great-than/less-than type queries very slow for continuous data types > like times, latitude, etc. Last time I looked they were converted into > huge OR queries and so had a maximum clause limit. > > I was wondering if any work had been done on integrating other index > implementations? > > Thanks, > > John > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Index-types-tp19177298p19178616.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
