Mmmkay. I think I'll wait, then. Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it.
Also, I really dig Lucene, so thanks for your hard work! -Matt Michael McCandless-2 wrote: > > > mattspitz wrote: > >> Is there no way to ensure consistency on the disk with 2.3.2? > > Unfortunately no. > >> This is a little off-topic, but is it worth upgrading to 2.4 right >> now if >> I've got a very stable system already implemented with 2.3.2? I don't >> really want to introduce oddities because I'm using an "unfinished" >> version >> of Lucene. Is there a rough date for 2.4's release? I poked around >> the >> website and couldn't find one. > > The trunk should be a drop-in replacement for 2.3.2, api-wise. But it > is not yet released, and there've been alot of changes, so it's > entirely possible there are bugs lurking. > > Unfortunately no date yet, but I agree we should do a release soon. > It's been a good while (7 months) since 2.3.0 was released, and there > are a number of improvements in 2.4. We talked a while back on the > dev list about doing releases more frequently. I'll start a thread on > the dev list to see what people think... > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Appropriate-disk-optimization-for-large-index--tp19009580p19040519.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
