I'm not sure which file in particular would be the one
corrupter/missing, which is why I suggested looking at the index with luke.
As for the jave 1.6 lucene 2.3.2 index corruption issue, I'm not 100%
familiar with the details on that one, but as a quick test, you should
be able to swap to a 1.5 version of java, reindex and see if that fixes
things.
Well.. unless your code uses something jave 6 specific I suppose.
Matt
Jamie wrote:
Hi Matthew
Thanks in advance for the suggestion.
Which file do you think does not exist?
This is what we have:
_15zw.cfs _19od.cfs _1a5d.cfs _1a7n.cfs _1ahf.cfs _1ahh.cfs
_qzl.cfs segments.gen
_1993.cfs _1a0w.cfs _1a7c.cfs _1a9m.cfs _1ahg.cfs _1ahi.cfs
segments_158j
Aside from Luke (which requires a GUI), it is there a command line
utility that can check the integrity of the index?
Jamie
Matthew Hall wrote:
Did you try to open the index using Luke?
Luke will be able to tell you whether or not the index is in fact
corrupted, but looking at your stack trace, it almost looks like the
file.. simply isn't there?
Matt
Jamie wrote:
Hi Everyone
I am getting the the following error when executing Hits hits =
searchers.search(query, queryFilter, sort):
18007414-java.io.IOException: Bad file descriptor
18007455- at java.io.RandomAccessFile.seek(Native Method)
18007504- at
org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory$FSIndexInput.readInternal(FSDirectory.java:545)
18007592- at
org.apache.lucene.store.BufferedIndexInput.readBytes(BufferedIndexInput.java:131)
18007678- at
org.apache.lucene.index.CompoundFileReader$CSIndexInput.readInternal(CompoundFileReader.java:240)
--
18009148- at
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldSortedHitQueue.getCachedComparator(FieldSortedHitQueue.java:168)
18009247- at
org.apache.lucene.search.FieldSortedHitQueue.<init>(FieldSortedHitQueue.java:56)
18009332- at
org.apache.lucene.search.TopFieldDocCollector.<init>(TopFieldDocCollector.java:43)
18009419- at
org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:122)
18009493- at
org.apache.lucene.search.MultiSearcherThread.run(ParallelMultiSearcher.java:250)
Does this mean the index is corrupted? Any idea why it would be
corrupted?
Jamie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Matthew Hall
Software Engineer
Mouse Genome Informatics
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(207) 288-6012
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
