Watch out though. By "hit' I assume you mean a Hits object. Iterating
over a large result set with a Hits object can be very inefficient because
the query re-executes every 100 or so. Think about a HitCollector
instead.
Best
Erick.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dr. Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah I think I got it
>
>
> hit.getDocument().getField("CityID").stringValue() seems to be what I
> wanted
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Dr. Fish wrote:
> >
> > I tried this first, and I was having trouble iterating over them.
> >
> >
> > If I do something like this
> >
> > hit.getDocument().getField("CountryID").toString()
> >
> > I get a big long BS object.. not just the result of my search.
> >
> > I also tried messing with the tokenStreamValue(), and had the same
> result.
> > How do I just get the value "countryID" out of the document?
> >
> >
> > Steven A Rowe wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dr. Fish,
> >>
> >> You could make just a single query with the broadest query possible -
> >> e.g.
> >>
> >> bacon AND country:"united states"
> >>
> >> and then iterate over all results, dividing them into your three buckets
> >> based on the values of the other two fields.
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> On 06/22/2008 at 12:29 PM, Dr. Fish wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I currently am using Lucene to index documents. I index 4
> >>> fields, the body
> >>> of the document, the city it is related to, the state it is
> >>> related to, and
> >>> the country it is related to.
> >>>
> >>> I have a java web application where the user types in some
> >>> search text.. and
> >>> it searches the body of the document for matches. This works fine.
> >>>
> >>> However, what I am loooking to do is generate 3 separate
> >>> mutually exclusive
> >>> search results.
> >>>
> >>> List 1) Results from text search, but also matching current user city,
> >>> state, and country
> >>>
> >>> List 2) Results from text search, but also matching current state and
> >>> country
> >>>
> >>> List 3) Result from text search, but also matching current country
> >>>
> >>> The idea would be for each search to be mutually exclusive.
> >>>
> >>> The naive way I know to do this, is to run 3 searches. For
> >>> example if My
> >>> Search text was "bacon", and my City was Chicago, IL... I
> >>> could do something
> >>> like
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> List 1 -> body:"bacon" AND city:"chicago" AND state:"illinois" AND
> >>> country:"united states"
> >>>
> >>> List 2 -> body:"bacon" NOT city:chicago" AND state:"illinois" AND
> >>> country:"united states"
> >>>
> >>> List 3-> body:"bacon" NOT city:chicago" NOT state:"illinois" AND
> >>> country:"united states"
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> So this gives me my 3 mutually exclusive lists... but it
> >>> makes me search the
> >>> database 3 times for each search I want to do. This seems
> >>> rather jank. Is
> >>> there some fancy Lucene tool I am missing that would let me
> >>> do this? I
> >>> don't have a ton of Lucene experience, so I think I am
> >>> missing something
> >>> obvious.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -- View this message in context:
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-mutually-exclusive-lists-of-
> >>> results-tp18056289p18056289.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users
> >>> mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To
> >>> unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> >>> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-make-mutually-exclusive-lists-of-results-tp18056289p18057829.html
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
