Yep, using a FieldSelector you can restrict the fields that will be loaded, you can also specify how fields should be loaded (normal, lazy or load the field, and then stop loading the document, i.e. skip other fields).
-----Original Message----- From: Marcelo Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 15:08 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Is it possible to get only one Field from a Document? Daan de Wit escreveu: > But I doubt this will solve your memory issue because nonstored fields are > not read when retrieving the document. > Thanks for the fast reply Daan! Just for clearance, if I had all the code fields (filters) stored, then it would make any difference? > -----Original Message----- > From: Daan de Wit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 13:44 > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Is it possible to get only one Field from a Document? > > This is possible, you need to provider a FieldSelector to > IndexReader#document(docId, selector). This won't work with Hits though, > because Hits does not expose the document number, so you need to roll your > own solution using TopDocs or HitCollector, for information see the > discussion in this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290 > > Kind regards, > Daan de Wit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcelo Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 13:29 > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Is it possible to get only one Field from a Document? > > I have a environment where we have indexed a DB with about 6mil entries > with Lucene, and each row has 25 columns. 20 cols have integer codes > used as filters (indexed/unstored), and the other 5 have (very) large > texts (also indexed/unstored). Currently the search I'm doing is like this: > > Hits hits = searcher.search(query); > for (int i = 0; i < this.hits.length(); i++) { > Document doc = this.hits.doc(i); > String s = doc.get("fieldWanted"); > // does everything with the result, etc > } > > We are trying to reduce memory usage, however. Is it possible to return > a Document object with just the Fields I really need? In the example, > each Document have 25 fields, and I just need one... would this > theoretically make any difference? -- Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus da Dígitro e acredita-se estar livre de perigo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
