Leandro skrev:
1ยบ Why need I pass a Directory objecto (obligatory) on constructor of
SpellChecker?
Mainly because it is a nasty peice of code. But it does a good job.
How can we suggest it (create an normal constructor without param) to the
team?
Sorry, I missunderstood your question. See other reply.
There are no typos in your example so you really don't even need a spell
checker for that. Using OR clauses in your query would be enough.
I guess no, because user will enter : "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of
the King" ... and the system should response with:
Similar:
The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
I can't see how can I do that? (just using the OR statement)
For example:
name like '%the%'
or
name like '%Lord%'
or
name like '%of%'
or
name like '%the%'
or
name like '%Rings%'
will produce so much results besides to be non-performatic...
Are you sure about that? Did you benchmark? Can we see the results?
karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
