<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does each searchable have it's own copy of Term and TermInfo arrays? So the amount in memory would grow with each new Searchable instance? If so, it might be worthwhile to implement a singleton MultiSearcher that is closed and re-opened periodically. What do you think?
Yes, yes and yes a single shared MultiSearcher would be better. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
