Ah, you didn't mention term vectors. What do you need them for? Perhaps a bit more background could help here.

-Grant

On Feb 27, 2008, at 1:31 PM, fangz wrote:


I implemented HitCollector as you suggested. It improved the initial run significantly. However it only showed slight improvement in the subsequent runs. I don't know how to implement FieldSelector in my situation. My codes
look like this:

public void collect( int doc, float score ) {

   TermFreqVector vector = null;
   vector = searcher.getIndexReader().getTermFreqVector(doc, "field");
   ...

Thank you again!

fangz
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistent-Search-Speed-tp15698325p15719770.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam

Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to