Hi, Do you really need to store those dates? Why not just index them and not store them if index size is a concern?
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- From: vivek sar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:06:25 PM Subject: Using RangeFilter Hi, I have a requirement to filter out documents by date range. I'm using RangeFilter (in combination to FilteredQuery) to do this. I was under the impression the filtering is done on documents, thus I'm just storing the date values, but not indexing them. As every new document would have a new date value indexing each date value field for every new document would be very expensive. We index pretty much over 10K new documents every minute, so I want to minimize the number of values I need to index. This is what I want to do, doc.add(new Field("optime", getDateStr(rs.getDate("optime")), Field.Store.YES, Field.Index.NO)); When I do this I always get 0 hits, but if I turn on indexing for date (Field.Index.NO_NORM) then I'm getting the right result. But, turning indexing on date field doubles my index size. My date format: 20080200000000 (yyyyMMddhhmiss) Is there any way I can filter on date value without indexing them? Thanks, -vivek --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
