You were right. I forgot I optimized the index at the end. Thanks for your help.
Erick Erickson wrote: > > Are you optimizing your index? I suspect that if you are, that's > the problem. > > Why does it matter? Is this just a curiosity question or is there > some problem? > > Best > Erick > > On Dec 27, 2007 12:18 PM, tgospodinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Does anyone know why JVM heap use almost doubles at the very end when >> indexing in memory? >> >> around 9 megs @ 1:03 min into indexing - around 18 megs @ 1:05 min when >> indexing is complete -> heap use jumps about 9 megs in 2 sec!? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/JVM-heap-when-indexing-in-memory-tp14515918p14515918.html >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JVM-heap-when-indexing-in-memory-tp14515918p14516597.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
