If I use BoostingTermQuery on a query containing terms without payloads, I
get very different results than doing the same query with TermQuery.
Presumably, this is because the BoostingSpanScorer/SpanScorer compute scores
differently than TermScorer. Is there a way to make BoostingTermQuery behave
like TermQuery for terms without payloads?

Peter


On 5/9/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> On May 9, 2007, at 2:39 AM, supereric wrote:
>
> >
> > How I can get the tag word score in lucene. suppose that you have
> > searched a
> > tag word and 3 hit documents
> > are now found.
> > 1 -How someone could find number of occurrences in any document so
> > it could
> > sort the results.
>
> Span Queries tell you where the matches occur in the document by
> offset, but I am not sure what your sorting criteria would be.  The
> explain method also can give you information about why a particular
> document scored a particular way.
>
>
> > Also I wan to have some other policies for ranking the results.
> > What should
> > I do to handle that. for example
> > I want to score boldfaced tag words in an html document twice
> > normal texts.
>
> Although totally experimental at this stage, the new Payload stuff in
> the trunk version of Lucene (or nightly builds) is designed for such
> a scenario.  Check out the BoostingTermQuery which can boost term
> scores based on the contents of a payload located at a particular
> term.  Feedback on the APIs is very much appreciated.
>
> > 2- How I can omit some tag words from the index?! for example
> > common words
> > in another language?
>
> See the StopFilter token filter and/or the StopwordAnalyzer
>
>
> >
> >
>
> HTH,
> Grant
>
> --------------------------
> Grant Ingersoll
> Center for Natural Language Processing
> http://www.cnlp.org/tech/lucene.asp
>
> Read the Lucene Java FAQ at http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/
> LuceneFAQ
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to