I've started to redo tests one at a time to see what exactly caused the
decreased index time.  Using the absolute path instead of the relative path
to the data doesn't seem to have made a significant difference, but using
StringBuffers (with a default of 250000) made a huge change.  I still have
to try having the RAMDir as the only change to see what happens.

--JP


On 8/15/07, Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, what worked? Using a RAMDir?
>
> Erick
>
> On 8/15/07, John Paul Sondag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It worked!  My indexing time went from over 6 hours to 592
> seconds!  Thank
> > you guys so much!
> >
> > --JP
> >
> > On 8/14/07, karl wettin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > 14 aug 2007 kl. 21.34 skrev John Paul Sondag:
> > >
> > > > What exactly is a RAMDirectory, I didn't see it mentioned on that
> > > > page.  Is
> > > > there example code of using it?   Do I just create a Ram Directory
> > > > and then
> > > > use it like it's a normal directory?
> > >
> > > Yes, it is just like FSDirectory, but resides in RAM and is not
> > > persistent.
> > >
> > > <http://www.google.com/search?q=RAMDirectory>
> > >
> > > --
> > > karl
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to