Antony Bowesman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/05/2007 22:48:41: > I read the new IndexWriter Javadoc and I'm unclear about this > autocommit. In > 2.1, I thought an IndexReader opened in an IndexSearcher does not "see" > additions to an index made by an IndexWriter, i.e. maxDoc and > numDocs remain > constant, so the statement > > "When autoCommit is true then every flush is also a commit (IndexReader > instances will see each flush as changes to the index). This is > the default, to > match the behavior before 2.2" > > makes me wonder if my assumptions are wrong. Can you clarify > what it means by > the IndexReader "seeing" changes to the index?
Antony, your assumptions were (and still are) correct - once an index reader is opened it is unaffected by changes to the underlying index. Would it be clearer if the javadoc said: "(An IndexReader instance will see changes to the index caused by flush operations that completed prior to opening that IndexReader instance)."? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]