Hi Otis, I tried both ways, did some queries, and results are the same, so I guess it's a matter of preference???
-Terry Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > > Terry, > I think you are right. Just use UN_TOKENIZED, that will do what you need. > > Otis > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . > Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: dontspamterry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: java-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 1:20:11 PM > Subject: KeywordAnalyzer vs. Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED > > > Hi all, > > I have an ID field which I index using the KeywordAnalyzer. Since this > analyzer tokenizes the entire stream as a single token, would you say the > end result is the same as using any analyzer and specifying this ID field > as > untokenized? The latter approach does not use the analyzer so would that > be > more "performant" than the KeywordAnalyzer since there is no call into the > analyzer's tokenization method? Is either approach acceptable or is there > one "proper" way of indexing fields where the entire field value requires > an > exact match, i.e. untokenized? Thanks! > > -Terry > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/KeywordAnalyzer-vs.-Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED-tf3811563.html#a10788664 > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/KeywordAnalyzer-vs.-Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED-tf3811563.html#a10790214 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
