On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:28:30AM -0400, Erick Erickson said: > If that's unacceptable, you can *still* open up a new reader in the > background and warm it up before using it. "immediately" then > becomes 5-10 seconds or so.
This is currently what I'm doing using a list of previous performed queries in combination with something similar to Aviran's suggestion of partitioning by date and only opening when the index changes. At the moment search is sufficently speedy that this works but in the future I think the definition of 'immediate' may well get relaxed. Thanks for all the suggestions - it's nice to know I wasn't completely off track and/or missing something obvious. Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
