Yes, you can search on UN_TOKENIZED fields, but they're exact, really, really exact <G>.
I'd recommend that you get a copy of Luke (google lucene luke) and examine your index to see what you actually have in your index. Also, you haven't provided us a clue what the actual query is. I'd use Query.toString(). I suspect that the query is getting tokenized if you're using one of the normal Analyzers... Erick On 4/5/07, Ryan O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey, I was just wondering if you are supposed to be able to search on UN_TOKENIZED fields? It seems like you can from the docs, but I have been unsuccessful. I want to do exact string matching on a certain field without analyzer interference. Thanks, Ryan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
