Chris Hostetter wrote:
that's a pretty specific and not all together intuitive ranking... can you
elaborate on your actual use case? ... why is B+C better then A+B ? .. are
these rules specific to a known list of terms, or is a general rule
relating to how you parse the users input?
The original user query was a Boolean query:
+(A B) +(C D)
It is possible that this query is to restrict. So I would like to give
the user to the hits matching his original query additional hits.
off the top of my head, i would suggest building one big BooleanQuery and
putting each of the permutations you care about in it as subqueries with
boosts that corripsond to their importance. you'll probably want to
disable the coord, and depending on how you want things to work if a doc
matches your "A+B" clause *and* matches your "B+C" clause you may want to
use a DisjunctionMaxQuery with a 0.0f tiebreaker value instead of a
BooleanQuery.
My first idea was sub classing TopDocCollector and overriding the
collect function. In this function I wanted to ask for terms of the
current document, calculate the score and call the collect function of
the base class with the new score as argument. I afraid it takes to much
time.
Boolean queries for each interesting combination with a corresponding
boost value should be faster.
Thank you, Hoss.
Sören
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
