Hello, this really doesn't answer my question ;)
I've indeed read the FAQ (though I couldn't believe this point ;) . Is it recommended to do the search again - discarding the uninteresting values - because lucene caches the results, or just because lucene is so damn fast? Johannes -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Limit-number-of-search-results-tf1998377.html#a5498319 Sent from the Lucene - Java Users forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]