o o no
I mean the searching would be fast or not... But now i have tested. The
result that i found reveals that there would be no difference in terms of
searching speed.
But there is another thing that i want to ask. What if the index is changed
in between.
Will the indexReader give the results with updated index ???
OR
Will the IndexSearcher give the results with updated index ???
OR
no matter what we are using we'll have to re-initialize either ??
Thanks and Regards,
On 6/28/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 28, 2006, at 6:53 AM, heritrix.lucene wrote:
> Is there any difference in terms of speed between IndexReader and
> IndexSearcher??
I'm assuming you mean is there any difference in speed in how you
construct an IndexSearcher.... no.
Erik
>
>
>
> On 6/27/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Fabrice Robini wrote:
>> > That's also my case...
>> > I create a new IndexSearcher at each query, but with a static and
>> > instanciated Directory.
>> >
>> > New IndexSearcher(myDirectory)
>> >
>> > It seems to be OK... am I wrong ?
>>
>> You may be "ok" given your query patterns, but you won't benefit from
>> Lucene internal caching unless you use a single IndexSearcher (or
>> IndexReader, as just pointed out).
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
