>From memory addIndexes() also does and optimization before hand, this might be what is taking the time.
Mike www.ardentia.com the home of NetSearch -----Original Message----- From: heritrix.lucene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 June 2006 05:05 To: java-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: addIndexes() is taking infinite time ... No. I haven't tried. Today i can try it. One thing that i m thinking is that what role does the file system plays here. I mean is there any difference on if i am doing indexing on FAT32 or i am on EXT3??? i'll have to find it out.... Can anybody put some light on this?? With regards On 6/22/06, Daniel Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > heritrix.lucene wrote: > > hi Otis, > > Now this time it took 10 Hr 34 Min. to merge the indexes. During merging > i > > noticed it was not completey using the CPU. I have 512MB RAM. and here i > > found it used upto the 256 MB. > > > > Are there some more possibilities to make it more fast ... > > Have you tested how fast the same process runs on different storage > devices? It sounds like you're bound by IO, and perhaps finding ways to > speed up the storage (RAID striping?) would help speed things up. > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Noll > > Nuix Pty Ltd > Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Ph: +61 2 9280 0699 > Web: http://www.nuix.com.au/ Fax: +61 2 9212 6902 > > This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not > the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, > distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this > message or attachment is strictly prohibited. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
