On 3/24/06, chan kang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I want to do is to show the results in > chronological order. (btw, the index contains the time field) > One solution I have thought up was: > 1. index the whole set > 2. read in all the time field values > 3. re-index the whole set according to time > (heard that the index order is same as insertion order) > 4. optimize. > > > However, although I think the step 3 would result > in a sorted index, isn't there a possibility that > step 4 might ruin all the sortedness? > - Wouldn't optimizing break the order in which they > are indexed?
Index order is retained, so your plan should work fine. How long is sorting actually taking? FYI, the first time you sort on a field will take much longer because a fieldcache entry must be populated. -Yonik http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, The Open Source Lucene Search Server --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
