I don't know a lot about the error your encountering (or not encountering as the case may be) but please for hte love of all that is sane use a Filter instead of putting all those categories in your Query.
Your search performance and your scores will thank you. : Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 18:52:22 -0500 : From: Kevin Dutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : Reply-To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : To: java-user@lucene.apache.org : Subject: Too many required clauses for a BooleanQuery : : Hey Everyone, : : I'm running into the "More than 32 required/prohibited clauses in query" : exception when running a query. I thought I understood the problem but the : following two scenarios confuse me. : : 1st - No Error : 33 required clauses plus additional clauses that are left off b/c they : are the same as the second scenario : ============================================= : (categorization:10102617 AND categorization:10102621 AND : categorization:10102625 AND categorization:10102629 AND : categorization:10102633 AND categorization:10102637 AND : categorization:10102641 AND categorization:10102645 AND : categorization:10102649 AND categorization:10102653 AND : categorization:10102657 AND categorization:10102661 AND : categorization:10102665 AND categorization:10102669 AND : categorization:10102673 AND categorization:10102677 AND : categorization:10102681 AND categorization:10102685 AND : categorization:10102689 AND categorization:10102693 AND : categorization:10102697 AND categorization:10102701 AND : categorization:10102705 AND categorization:10102709 AND : categorization:10102713 AND categorization:10102717 AND : categorization:10102721 AND categorization:10102725 AND : categorization:10102729 AND categorization:10102733 AND : categorization:10102737 AND categorization:10102741 AND : categorization:10102745) AND ... : : 2nd - Error : The 33 required clauses above with the addition of a required : clause that is 3 OR'd clauses : ============================================ : ((categorization:10102405 OR categorization:10102409 OR : categorization:10102413) AND categorization:10102617 AND : categorization:10102621 AND categorization:10102625 AND : categorization:10102629 AND categorization:10102633 AND : categorization:10102637 AND categorization:10102641 AND : categorization:10102645 AND categorization:10102649 AND : categorization:10102653 AND categorization:10102657 AND : categorization:10102661 AND categorization:10102665 AND : categorization:10102669 AND categorization:10102673 AND : categorization:10102677 AND categorization:10102681 AND : categorization:10102685 AND categorization:10102689 AND : categorization:10102693 AND categorization:10102697 AND : categorization:10102701 AND categorization:10102705 AND : categorization:10102709 AND categorization:10102713 AND : categorization:10102717 AND categorization:10102721 AND : categorization:10102725 AND categorization:10102729 AND : categorization:10102733 AND categorization:10102737 AND : categorization:10102741 AND categorization:10102745) AND ... : : I can add additional required clauses to the 1st scenario without any : problems. So why am I seeing the error in the second scenario and not the : first? After discovering the error, I expected to see it in the first : scenario also. Is there anyway around this error? : : As a side note, it is very unlikely that this will be encountered in the : real world, but b/c we are dealing with content categorization it is still : possible. : : Thanks in advance, : : Kevin : -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
