I'd love to try this, but I'm not aware of any 64-bit jvms for Windows on
Intel. If you know of any, please let me know. Linux may be an option, too.

btw, I'm getting a sustained rate of 135 queries/sec with 4 threads, which
is pretty impressive. Another way around the concurrency limit is to run
multiple jvms. The throughput of each is less, but the aggregate throughput
is higher.

Peter


On 1/26/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, can you run the 64 bit version of Windows (and hence a 64 bit JVM?)
> We're running with heap sizes up to 8GB (RH Linux 64 bit, Opterons,
> Sun Java 1.5)
>
> -Yonik
>
> On 1/26/06, Peter Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > I tried this but it ran out of memory trying to read the 500Mb .fdt
> file. I
> > tried various values for MAX_BBUF, but it still ran out of memory (I'm
> using
> > -Xmx1600M, which is the jvm's maximum value (v1.5))  I'll give
> > NioFSDirectory a try.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > On 1/26/06, Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2006 20:51, Peter Keegan wrote:
> > > > The index is non-compound format and optimized. Yes, I did try
> > > > MMapDirectory, but the index is too big - 3.5 GB (1.3GB is term
> vectors)
> > > >
> > > > Peter
> > > >
> > > You could also give this a try:
> > >
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-283
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Paul Elschot
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to