Doug Cutting wrote:
Daniel Noll wrote:
I actually did throw a lot of terms in, and eventually chose "one"
for the tests because it was the slowest query to complete of them
all (hence I figured it was already spending some fairly long time in
I/O, and would be penalised the most.) Every other query was around
7ms before tweaking, and the tweak increased them all to somewhere
around 10ms but that's still a lot faster than "one" was even at its
fastest.
Different terms are affected differently by this tweak, so results for
a single term don't reveal much.
Hence why I just said: "I actually did throw a lot of terms in".
(IMO, "A lot" sort of implies that it wasn't a single term.)
Daniel
--
Daniel Noll
NUIX Pty Ltd
Level 8, 143 York Street, Sydney 2000
Phone: (02) 9283 9010
Fax: (02) 9283 9020
This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
message or attachment is strictly prohibited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
