This is really interesting, I haven't revved our code to this version yet. Does the score returned by FunctionQuery supersede underlying relevance scoring or is it rolled in at some base class?
-- j On 10/22/05, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not sure what type of score you are trying to do, but maybe > FunctionQuery would help. > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446 > > -Yonik > Now hiring -- http://forms.cnet.com/slink?231706 > > On 10/22/05, Jeff Rodenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have a custom sort that completes calculations on-the-fly, similar to > > the > > LIA distance sort. SortField type is Float. It works, but I need better > > performance. I'm wondering if there's a better way to do this. > > > > As a rule, the number of results returned in a given search will most > > often > > be a fraction of the total documents in the search indexes. For example, > > 1000 results would be a rather large result set for what I'm expecting. > > The > > aggregate index document count is in the range of 20 million. > > > > The standard process of looping through the TermDocs from readers for > the > > aggregate index seems wasteful in this scenario, given the relative > number > > of results to the overall size of the index. What are my options here? > > > > Thanks > > jeff > > > > > >
