Max Pfingsthorn wrote: >Hi! > >Thanks for the reply. I figured already that fields are actually not >tokenized... I lost track of the filenames/dirnames and there were some >duplicates... > >About case-insensitivity: Okay, I can make my query lower case, but my strings >in the field are not... I guess I have to do that manually during indexing? Or >is there some nicer way? > > I think this is not a problem. This should be done automatically when you make a case insensitiv search so that you don't have to think about it. If it should become a problem write another email *g* Stefan
>Thanks! >Max Pfingsthorn > >-----Original Message----- >From: Gusenbauer Stefan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 18:00 >To: java-user@lucene.apache.org >Subject: Re: Confused about non-tokenized fields > > >Max Pfingsthorn wrote: > > > >>Hi! >> >>In my application, I index some strings (like filenames) untokenized, meaning >>via >> >>doc.add(new Field(FIELD,VALUE,false,true,false)); >> >>When I later take a look at it with Luke, I still get tokens of the filenames >>(like "news" instead of "news-item.xml") in the list of most frequent terms. >>Shouldn't I get only the complete filenames there?? >> >>Also, how do I search case-insensitive over this kind of field? >> >>Thanks! >> >>Best regards, >> >>Max Pfingsthorn >> >>Hippo >> >>Oosteinde 11 >>1017WT Amsterdam >>The Netherlands >>Tel +31 (0)20 5224466 >>------------------------------------------------------------- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.hippo.nl >>-------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >For indexing untokenized fields try the static method >Field.Keyword(String fieldname,String value) then the string is really >not tokenized. But i think new Field with your params should make the >same. Have you tried to make a search for the filename this should only >return a result when you write out the whole filename. > >Case insensitive search is standard when you use the standardanalyzer i >think: >the code should look like this >Searcher.search(QueryParser.parse("the query string","the fieldname",new >StandardAnalyzer()); > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
