Thanks Morus.
I will very soon be running experiments against a very large dataset using the trunk of Lucene and will report some statistics then.
Erik
On Apr 6, 2005, at 3:26 AM, Morus Walter wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your very thorough response. It is very helpful.
For all my projects, I'm using the latest Subversion codebase and staying current with any changes there, so that is very good news.
For lucene-1.4.final I find that some query on a real life index of the form a AND b AND c AND d AND e AND f takes ~ 10 ms a AND ( b AND ( c AND ( d AND ( e AND f ) ) ) ) ~ 42 ms and ( ( ( ( ( a AND b ) AND c ) AND d ) AND e ) AND f ) ~ 33 ms
Queries were repeated in order to exclude any IO time. Index size ~ 1 G (~ 1.5 Mio documents), 6 hits.
Of course that's not a systematic test, but I thought you might be interested
anyway. I don't have the time to see how this would look like using
svn head.
Morus
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
