Hey Mukul,
Sorry I should have been more specific. I'm sure that Xerces does indeed pass the XML Schema 1.1 test suite. That said, we have run into a number of issues that are directly related with errors in XPath -- which XML Schema 1.1 uses for assertions. So when I say test suite, I'm talking about PsycoPath passing the W3C XPath / XQuery test suite. If you look at the github project (https://github.com/sharwell/webtools.sourceediting.xpath), you can see that Sam has integrated the test suite into the build process and you can see specifically which tests are failing and which tests have been corrected in the Rackspace branch. -jOrGe W. ________________________________ From: Mukul Gandhi <muk...@apache.org> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 3:58 AM To: j-users@xerces.apache.org Cc: s...@tunnelvisionlabs.com Subject: Re: Interaction between redefine+include breaks augmenting a base schema's element with new attributes Hi Jorge, We (that includes I think me, Jesper & Dave Carver) had done various fixes earlier to the originally contributed PsycoPath library that Xerces uses for its XML Schema 1.1 implementation. I can say with much responsibility (being a previous committer to Eclipse WTP source editing, and also as a PMC member of Xerces), that the current jar file for PsycoPath, on Xerces SVN conforms fully to the W3C XML Schema 1.1 test suite. You say, '.. XPath 2 implementation reports over 800 failures in the W3C test suite'. I'm curious what W3C XML Schema 1.1 tests, you and Sam found that PsycoPath library used by Xerces does not pass? Our XML Schema 1.1 conformance reports are located at: http://wiki.apache.org/xerces/xmlschema11TestSuiteReports. I believe, this is also indirectly linked from the XML Schema 1.1 specification. On 24 June 2016 at 02:49, Jorge Williams <jorge.willi...@rackspace.com<mailto:jorge.willi...@rackspace.com>> wrote: Hey Guys, If we are planning a release of Xerces, may I suggest that we also update version of PsycoPath that Xerces is currently using. The current version of the XPath 2 implementation reports over 800 failures in the W3C test suite. Sam Harwell has been able to reduce this number to about 34! I’m in the process of reviewing these fixes — which you can find here: <https://github.com/sharwell/webtools.sourceediting.xpath/pulls>https://github.com/sharwell/webtools.sourceediting.xpath/pulls Any help with these code review these PRs would be great and it would be awesome to include a new build of PsycoPath with the next Xerces release. Thanks, -jOrGe W. > On Jun 17, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Michael Glavassevich > <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com<mailto:mrgla...@ca.ibm.com>> wrote: > > Thanks David. > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Technologies and WAS Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com<mailto:mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> > E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org<mailto:mrgla...@apache.org> > > David Costanzo <david_costa...@yahoo.com<mailto:david_costa...@yahoo.com>> > wrote on 06/17/2016 09:37:56 AM: > >> From: David Costanzo >>>> I started with the JIRA release notes [1] and it doesn't look like I >>>> have permissions to help with this. [snip] >> >> From: Michael Glavassevich >>> I just add you to the list of contributors in JIRA. Hopefully that > also >>> granted you permission to update that field. >> >> Yes, that works. I should be able to build up the release notes, >> now. I'll start a new thread in the "xerces-devs" list for any >> conversation specific to the 2.12.0 release, instead of rambling >> off-topic on this thread. >> >> >> >> From: David Costanzo >> >>>> As mentioned previously, the fix that my organization wants > > >> (XERCESJ-1591, r1396551) was made in the "xml-schema-1.1-dev" >>>> branch, not trunk, so that branch would have to be merged back to >>>> trunk (or the fix duplicated in trunk) in order for a 2.12.0 release >>>> to benefit my organization. >> >> >> From: Michael Glavassevich >>> I'll take a look at the original fix. Assuming it applies to XML > Schema >>> 1.0, it should have been committed at the same time to the trunk. >> >> >> That would be appreciated, Michael. Thanks. >> -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
