On 3/4/15, 6:34 PM, "Michael Glavassevich" <mrgla...@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
> >And I was pointing out that it's irrelevant to Jim's concern. I'm betting Jim's concern is with the parser being secure, period, not just in one specific way, but he can speak for himself. >If you're interested in seeing a release which rolls up this and other >fixes from the trunk, that's another discussion. The long period of time >between Xerces releases boils down to a lack of time from developers and >low interest from the community to motivate a new release. I think the situation is clear to anybody reading this thread now that isn't hiding their heads in the sand, which was my only intention. -- Scott
