"Jacob Kjome" <h...@visi.com> wrote on 02/11/2012 02:19:44 PM:
<snip/> > I feel for you, but there's little I or anyone else can do for you. Michael > already stated that there's no one currently working on Xerces that has any > deep understanding of the ancient Xerces1 codebase. All efforts have been in > developing Xerces2 for a very long time. And the two codebases diverge > greatly. For the record Xerces1 was pretty much dead before I arrived (and I've been around a long time). As is the case for most other developers who've worked on the project, Xerces2 is the only generation I've ever contributed to. For folks who are still using Xerces1 they're pretty much on their own at this point. They really need to upgrade. > Again, your best bet in the immediate term is to update to the latest version > of Xerces1. Your best bet in the long term is to update to Xerces2,which you > will actually find support for on this list. > > > Jake > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org Michael Glavassevich XML Technologies and WAS Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org
