Chris Simmons <c...@corefiling.com> wrote on 10/20/2010 04:22:06 AM: > I was hoping to upgrade our application to use Xerces 2.10 in order to > get the fix for this issue:- > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1323 > > However our application doesn't work with Xerces 2.10 (we're currently > using 2.9.1). I think I've tracked down the problem to be the issue > logged here:- > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESJ-1463 > > I've tested against Xerces trunk (r1024302) and everything appears fine > there at least. > > As I understand things this seems like quite a serious regression to me > as anyone using a grammar cache with schemas that use substitution > groups will hit problems.
It depends on what their grammar pool has already returned. If the grammar being searched for is available in the local cache (a.k.a. grammar bucket) they won't hit this issue.> > I was wondering if there's going to be a > maintenance release of the 2.10 code base to fix this? The revision > where this was fixed didn't apply cleanly to 2.10 so its probably going > to require someone who understands the changes to carefully review them. > > If not 2.10.1 when are we likely to see 2.11? We've discussed [1] having a 2.11.0 release at the end of November. > Kind regards, > > Chris Simmons. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: j-users-unsubscr...@xerces.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: j-users-h...@xerces.apache.org Thanks. [1] http://markmail.org/message/wgp7cyqpz7ej3dnk Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org
