govelogo <govel...@gmail.com> wrote on 07/03/2009 10:44:17 AM:
> Hi there,
>
> I am running the jaxp.TypeInfoWriter to parse a xml. For one
> element, I got this result,
>
> startElement(name="{http://crm.testschema.
> ca/xml/as/ServiceAndOfferMapping/v1-0}associatedWithServices",type="{
> http://crm.testschema.ca/xml/as/ServiceAndOfferMapping/v1-0}
>
#AnonType_associatedWithServicesInstalledProductOfferingValueType",qname="
> saom:associatedWithServices",attributes={})
>
> inside the ServiceAndOfferMapping (saom) .xsd,
> "associatedWithServices" is defined here as below, (the schema for
> cbeservice-v1-5 is "http://ossj.org/xml/Common-CBEService/v1-5";)>
>
> <xs:complexType name="InstalledProductOfferingValueType">
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="cbeproductoffering-v1-5:ProductOfferingValue">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="associatedWithServices" minOccurs="0">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:complexContent>
> <xs:extension base="cbeservice-v1-5:ArrayOfServiceKey"/>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:extension>
> </xs:complexContent>
> </xs:complexType>
> <xs:element name="serviceAndOfferMapping" type="saom:
> ServiceAndOfferMappingType"/>
>
> My question is why the type name is not shown as the base type (
> cbeservice-v1-5:ArrayOfServiceKey), but rather like a garbage string
> (in red color)?
Because the base type is not its type. The type of "associatedWithServices"
actually has no name. It's anonymous, however the API [1] you're using
requires that implementations produce an "anonymous type name" [2] to
uniquely identify the anonymous type and that is what you're getting.
> many thanks,
> David
[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407/core.html#TypeInfo
[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-DOM-Level-3-Core-20040407/glossary.html#dt-anonymous
Thanks.
Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: mrgla...@ca.ibm.com
E-mail: mrgla...@apache.org
