Hi Joe, I don't see 0xF7 in that list. Checking the Unicode code charts it's defined to be the division sign [1] (which is what Steve said it was in his post).
Thanks. [1] http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0080.pdf Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/07/2007 09:43:18 AM: > For what it's worth, 0xF7 is one of the characters which both the > XML 1.0 and 1.1 recommendations suggest should be avoided by > document authors. "They are either control characters or permanently > undefined Unicode characters" (http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#charsets) > > ______________________________________ > "... Three things see no end: A loop with exit code done wrong, > A semaphore untested, And the change that comes along. ..." > -- "Threes" Rev 1.1 - Duane Elms / Leslie Fish (http://www.ovff. > org/pegasus/songs/threes-rev-11.html) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
