>From what I've read [1] about it, it isn't a conforming XML parser. It apparently doesn't support DTDs, external entities, documents larger than a billion characters and who knows what else. Sounds like a niche product to me.
[1] http://www.cafeconleche.org/oldnews/news2006April13.html Michael Glavassevich XML Parser Development IBM Toronto Lab E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/13/2006 03:05:57 PM: > I noticed an article on TheServerside [1] about VDT-XML [2]. I'm curious what > the Xerces team thinks about it? It looks like performance and a small memory > footprint are priority #1 [3][4]. I'm not sure how good they are about > correctness? Is VDT-XML a niche product, or could it's approach provide the > way forward for XML parsers? Are they competition for Xerces or a performant, > but limited, alternative? > > Jake > > [1] http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=43432 > [2] http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/ > [3] http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/benchmark.html > [4] http://vtd-xml.sourceforge.net/benchmark2.html > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
