I fully agree with Dick about the implementation of Validation API, I've been developing a XML Schema aware authoring tool and i found quite difficult to sort out node validation related problems e.g which nodes are allowed as children of a specified node or which are prohibited there and etc. Would be so easier to do that with Validation API.
Jakub -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 10/5/2005 11:11 AM To: j-users@xerces.apache.org Subject: RE: Matching a Node with his ElementDeclaration Thanks again for your answers. It surprises me that there is only small interest in the implementation of the DOM Level 3 Validation Specification. Especially in the area of XML tools these proposed interfaces would gave us great convenience. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Michael Glavassevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: dinsdag 4 oktober 2005 20:01 > Aan: j-users@xerces.apache.org > Onderwerp: Re: Matching a Node with his ElementDeclaration > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/04/2005 04:06:09 AM: > > > It is easy to retrieve typeInfo (via getElementDeclaration) of a > > Node if this node has been validated and therefore is an instanceof > > PSVIElement. > > But how can I come to ElementDeclaration when the node was not > > validated. I do have a schemagrammar in the form a an XSModel. I > > cannot see another way to find the related ElementDeclarion other > > then traversing and analyzing the XSModel. But this can be a > > complicated task and I would prefer a more simple method. > > A related question. > > If the DOM isn't annotated with PSVI then something external > needs to make > the association. If you're using the XSModel for this purpose > you do need > to traverse it. > > > In the DOM Level 3 Validation Specification is > > an interface ElementEditVAL, with methods like getAllowedChildren. > > Is there any chance these specifications will be > implemented in Xerces? > > Perhaps in a future release though I'm not aware of any plans > to work on > it. There hasn't been much discussion about it on the lists. > > > I' am using to Xerces 2.6.2. > > DD > > Michael Glavassevich > XML Parser Development > IBM Toronto Lab > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or opening it. Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. If this message contains password-protected attachments, the files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. Always scan attachments before opening them. ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<winmail.dat>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
