On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:21:45 +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 04:49:08PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 04:02:37PM +0100, Tomas Tintera wrote: > > > I prepared a patch that implements what I suggested. > > > > > > > I think mbsync should cache the state of last UIDNEXT received > > > > before APPENDing a message and use this value for > > > > the "UID FETCH xxx:1000000000" command. > > > > > > Attached is the patch for the current commit f377e7b6 that seems to > > > fix the bug for me. > > > > > thanks, i'll have a look on one of the next weekends. > > > please try the uidnext branch.
The version in the uidnext branch seems to work well with that IMAP server. Thank you. Best regards, -- Tomas "trosos" Tintera ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet _______________________________________________ isync-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel
