[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-60096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ivan Sadikov updated SPARK-60096:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
Spark Connect turns DataFrame subqueries such as `col.isin(df)`, `df.scalar()`, 
`df.exists()`, and table arguments into `UnresolvedPlanId` expressions 
(`UnresolvedInSubqueryPlanId`, `UnresolvedScalarSubqueryPlanId`, 
`UnresolvedExistsPlanId`, `UnresolvedTableArgPlanId`). These expressions point 
to the subquery plan by plan id. Only 
`SparkConnectPlanner.transformWithRelations` replaces them with the real plan, 
and it only does so when the root relation is wrapped in a `WithRelations` that 
contains the referenced plan.

If the referenced plan is never attached (for example, the root relation is not 
wrapped in `WithRelations`), the `UnresolvedPlanId` stays in the tree through 
analysis. No analyzer rule resolves it, and CheckAnalysis has no specific case 
for it. It therefore reaches the generic unresolved-operator check and fails 
with an internal error:
{code:java}
[INTERNAL_ERROR] Found the unresolved operator: ... SQLSTATE: XX000 {code}
This is a resolution error caused by an illegal subquery reference, not a Spark 
bug. It should be reported the same way as the existing 
`CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN` error, which is raised for an illegal 
DataFrame column reference.

 

Valid queries are not affected. The only change is the error class and SQLSTATE 
for queries that already fail.

  was:
Spark Connect turns DataFrame subqueries such as `col.isin(df)`, `df.scalar()`, 
`df.exists()`, and table arguments into `UnresolvedPlanId` expressions 
(`UnresolvedInSubqueryPlanId`,

  `UnresolvedScalarSubqueryPlanId`, `UnresolvedExistsPlanId`, 
`UnresolvedTableArgPlanId`). These

  expressions point to the subquery plan by plan id. Only 
`SparkConnectPlanner.transformWithRelations`

  replaces them with the real plan, and it only does so when the root relation 
is wrapped in a

  `WithRelations` that contains the referenced plan.

 

  If the referenced plan is never attached (for example, the root relation is 
not wrapped in

  `WithRelations`), the `UnresolvedPlanId` stays in the tree through analysis. 
No analyzer rule

  resolves it, and CheckAnalysis has no specific case for it. It therefore 
reaches the generic

  unresolved-operator check and fails with an internal error:

 

    [INTERNAL_ERROR] Found the unresolved operator: ... SQLSTATE: XX000

 

  This is a resolution error caused by an illegal subquery reference, not a 
Spark bug. It should

  be reported the same way as the existing `CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN` 
error, which is raised

  for an illegal DataFrame column reference.

 

  Proposed change:

  - Add a new error condition `CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_SUBQUERY` (SQLSTATE 
42704):

    "Cannot resolve the DataFrame subquery referenced by plan id <planId>. It's 
probably because of

    an illegal subquery reference, such as using a subquery DataFrame that is 
not part of the

    current query."

  - In `CheckAnalysis.checkAnalysis0`, match `UnresolvedPlanId` in the 
expression-level checks and

    throw this `AnalysisException`, with the expression's origin, instead of 
the generic

    INTERNAL_ERROR.

  - Add a test to `SparkConnectProtoSuite`: build an IN-subquery with a plan id 
that is not

    attached, nested inside `when(...)`. Check that the planner leaves an

    `UnresolvedInSubqueryPlanId` in the plan and that analysis now fails with

    `CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_SUBQUERY`.

  

  Valid queries are not affected. The only change is the error class and 
SQLSTATE for queries

  that already fail.


> Raise a user-facing error instead of INTERNAL_ERROR for an unresolved Spark 
> Connect DataFrame subquery plan id
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-60096
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-60096
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connect, SQL
>    Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>            Reporter: Ivan Sadikov
>            Priority: Major
>
> Spark Connect turns DataFrame subqueries such as `col.isin(df)`, 
> `df.scalar()`, `df.exists()`, and table arguments into `UnresolvedPlanId` 
> expressions (`UnresolvedInSubqueryPlanId`, `UnresolvedScalarSubqueryPlanId`, 
> `UnresolvedExistsPlanId`, `UnresolvedTableArgPlanId`). These expressions 
> point to the subquery plan by plan id. Only 
> `SparkConnectPlanner.transformWithRelations` replaces them with the real 
> plan, and it only does so when the root relation is wrapped in a 
> `WithRelations` that contains the referenced plan.
> If the referenced plan is never attached (for example, the root relation is 
> not wrapped in `WithRelations`), the `UnresolvedPlanId` stays in the tree 
> through analysis. No analyzer rule resolves it, and CheckAnalysis has no 
> specific case for it. It therefore reaches the generic unresolved-operator 
> check and fails with an internal error:
> {code:java}
> [INTERNAL_ERROR] Found the unresolved operator: ... SQLSTATE: XX000 {code}
> This is a resolution error caused by an illegal subquery reference, not a 
> Spark bug. It should be reported the same way as the existing 
> `CANNOT_RESOLVE_DATAFRAME_COLUMN` error, which is raised for an illegal 
> DataFrame column reference.
>  
> Valid queries are not affected. The only change is the error class and 
> SQLSTATE for queries that already fail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to