[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

John Zhuge updated SPARK-59724:
-------------------------------
    Summary: Coalesce per-response ReleaseExecute RPCs to cut per-statement 
round-trip overhead  (was: [Spark Connect] Coalesce per-response ReleaseExecute 
RPCs to cut per-statement round-trip overhead)

> Coalesce per-response ReleaseExecute RPCs to cut per-statement round-trip 
> overhead
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-59724
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59724
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Connect
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>            Reporter: John Zhuge
>            Priority: Minor
>
> A reattachable statement sends ExecutePlan plus one *ReleaseExecute* 
> synchronously per response batch. Many release RPCs for a small statement 
> like "USE default". The latency is acerbated when one or more hops are 
> inserted between Spark Connect client and server, e.g. a reserve proxy.
> Releases are important to release sources on the server, however
>  * after every response, ExecuteResponseObserver keeps only
> the last observerRetryBufferSize (default 10m)
>  * Release timing does not seem to affect correctness.
> Periodic maintenance checks also help
> {noformat}
>   spark.connect.execute.manager.detachedTimeout — default 5m
>   spark.connect.execute.manager.maintenanceInterval — default 30s
> {noformat}
>  
> Thus I'd like to propose coalescing multiple releases, disabled by default,
> {noformat}
>   spark.connect.execute.reattachable.release.batch = 1 (default)
> {noformat}
>  
> SPARK-59032 is about release leak; this is the round-trip overhead.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to