[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated SPARK-59071:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Measure Rust coverage against a live Spark Connect server so the badge 
> reflects real coverage
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-59071
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-59071
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Project Infra
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.0
>            Reporter: Hyukjin Kwon
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> The Coverage workflow (.github/workflows/coverage.yml) runs 'cargo llvm-cov 
> -p apache-spark-connect' with no Spark Connect server and no SPARK_REMOTE 
> set. The behavioral e2e_*.rs tests self-gate on SPARK_REMOTE (should_run() 
> returns early when it is unset), so they no-op in the coverage job and the 
> runtime execution paths (collect/count/RPC-backed DataFrame, functions, 
> session, catalog, ...) are never exercised. As a result the Rust coverage 
> badge reports ~73.3%, well below the real coverage.
> These same e2e tests run in build_python_connect.yml, which downloads Spark 
> 4.2.0, starts a Connect server, and sets SPARK_REMOTE.
> Fix: make the coverage job start a Spark Connect server (mirroring 
> build_python_connect.yml) and measure coverage in two accumulated 
> cargo-llvm-cov passes, then combine them: (1) the default unit + golden 
> tests, and (2) the behavioral e2e suite against the live server. This makes 
> the badge reflect the coverage actually achieved when the runtime paths are 
> exercised.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to