dsmiley commented on PR #3163: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/3163#issuecomment-2700120656
> But if SMO is backed by a LinkedHashMap, wouldn't then these changes become obsolete? What is the point of unmarshalling to SMO (backed by a LinkedHashMap) instead of a directly to a LinkedHashMap? Only an SMO is also a NamedList. A LinkedHashMap itself is not. I was thinking about the need for this a bit more. The primary concern is a SolrJ 9 reading data sent from Solr 10, which will see more expanded use of SimpleOrderedMap that was previously a NamedList. Other circumstances can leave this disabled by default. In Solr 9 specifically, we could change BinaryResponseParser to detect the version of the writer in some way TBD and then act accordingly. A separate issue/PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
