fsparv commented on code in PR #2801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2801#discussion_r1834560447


##########
solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/core/ExitableDirectoryReaderTest.java:
##########
@@ -70,9 +70,12 @@ public void testPrefixQuery() throws Exception {
 
     // this time we should get a query cache hit and hopefully no exception?  
this may change in the
     // future if time checks are put into other places.
-    assertJQ(req("q", q, "timeAllowed", "1", "sleep", sleep), assertionString);
+    // 2024-4-15: it did change..., and now this fails with 1 or 2 ms and 
passes with 3ms... I see
+    // no way this won't be terribly brittle. Maybe TestInjection of some sort 
to bring this back?

Review Comment:
   I don't think that helps. The test wants to verify that the result was 
cached and is hoping that the request **_won't_** time out because of that, but 
that only worked because timeAllowed was only measured/triggered in a small 
area of code sensitive to the availability of the cache. Now we check it all 
over the place. If we raise the limit too much it's not a test, and if this 
test gets starved for resources it will fail spuriously.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to