bcbrockway commented on issue #489: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr-operator/issues/489#issuecomment-2368300581
To the maintainers: Is there a particular reason you specify your own fields in podOptions.podSecurityContext instead of just accepting a [k8s podSecurityContext API type](https://pkg.go.dev/k8s.io/api/core/v1#PodSecurityContext)? Using the upstream k8s type would mean that no-one would manually have to add fields available in the k8s type to the securityContext objects in this CRD, right? I'm definitely no expert, but I've seen this done in other operators. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
