cpoerschke commented on PR #2664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/2664#issuecomment-2333550727
> I've not seen a Solr PR that depends on a Lucene PR that is unmerged :-).
It's getting ahead of ourselves. Is the point to see if there are API problems
in Solr code?
Yes, to gauge what this might look like from the Solr/application
perspective, e.g.
* it seems straightforward to support,
* (perhaps) clarifies that (currently) there is no "how many" number
associated with the seed query, and
* the seed query will need a parameter name, obviously.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
