[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17854758#comment-17854758
]
Thomas Wöckinger edited comment on SOLR-17324 at 6/13/24 3:01 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
It is a bit worse, as solr-solrj-zookeeper is using the scope `runtime`, so it
is possible if a maven project includes both solr-solrj and
solr-solrj-zookeeper that the resulting scope will be runtime, and therefore
solr-solrj will not be included in projects which are using it as dependency
(runtime scope will not propagate).
was (Author: thomas.woeckinger):
It is a bit worse, as solr-solrj-zookeeper is using the scope `runtime`, so it
is possible if a maven project includes both solr-solrj and
solr-solrj-zookeeper that the resulting scope will be runtime, and therefore
solr-solrj will not be included in projects which are using (runtime scope will
not propagate).
> Weird SolrJ Dependency Tree
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17324
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17324
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SolrJ
> Affects Versions: 9.6.1
> Reporter: Thomas Wöckinger
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently solr-solrj-zookeeper depends on solr-solrj, which itself depends on
> solr-solrj-zookeeper.
> This should be avoided!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
