[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17826024#comment-17826024
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-17161:
------------------------------------
Trying to poc a new solrj-jettyclient package. But the jetty classes are a bit
entangled here and there, also outside of Http2SolrClient. One I found was that
abstract base class {{CloudSolrClient}} has a {{Builder}} that extends
{{{}CloudHttp2SolrClient.Builder{}}}:
{code:java}
public static class Builder extends CloudHttp2SolrClient.Builder {code}
Why do we even have a Builder on this abstract class, when users can do
`CloudHttp2SolrClient.Builder` instead?
We either need to deprecate in 9x and remove in main this builder, or we need
to create a {{CloudHttpJdkSolrClient}} that this builder can create instead.
> Separate out a solrj-jetty package / artifact
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-17161
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-17161
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: clients - java
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Priority: Major
>
> Given we have a native JDK based client in SOLR-599, we can separate out all
> {{Http2SolrClient}} and freiends with their jetty-client dependencies into a
> separate artifact {{{}solrj-jetty{}}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
