[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17768093#comment-17768093 ]
Houston Putman commented on SOLR-16979: --------------------------------------- Just figured out another bin/solr command that tries to find a running Solr process instead of using SOLR_PORT. "solr auth". It also doesn't support -p... What a weird strategy for it. We really need to have a unified way of specifying port (-p, then the only running Solr process, then SOLR_PORT as a default) across all bin/solr commands. This is causing the integration tests to fail when there are other processes running on the machine. > Randomize ports in BATS tests > ----------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-16979 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16979 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Components: Integration Tests > Reporter: Jan Høydahl > Assignee: Jan Høydahl > Priority: Major > Fix For: 9.4 > > Time Spent: 5h 40m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Currently all BATS tests run solr on port 8983. This means only one test can > run at a time, and there is greater risk for port conflict on CI environments. > Introduce random port assignment. Can be done by setting SOLR_PORT > env.variable in build.gradle. And perhaps also setting a SOLR2_PORT variable > for those tests that explicitly starts a second instance. > Also, at the end of tests, try to assert that no process is still running, > and properly clean up. > Ref discussion in dev@ > https://lists.apache.org/thread/j9t29wx8zg9oj6xy9tnn8cq063nrp6yp -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org