[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alessandro Benedetti updated SOLR-16596:
----------------------------------------
    Component/s: contrib - LTR

> LTR MultipleAdditiveTreeModel do not support missing features' value
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-16596
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16596
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib - LTR
>            Reporter: Anna
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 9.2
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The current MultipleAdditiveTree model doesn't support missing features' 
> values.
> When a feature value is not passed, the model directly translates it to zero.
> Other LTR model libraries, like xgboost, are able to differentiate missing 
> values from other values and also from zero values. They learn how to treat 
> missing values at training time and add an additional "missing" branch to the 
> tree with the direction learned to be the best in that situation.
> It would be nice to integrate this feature also in Solr MultipleAdditiveTree 
> models. An additional "missing" parameter should be added to the 
> RegressionTreeNode. This will determine the direction to take in case the 
> feature value is missing.
> This integration will allow us to differentiate between zero and missing 
> features. 
> For example, if the feature is "hotel_avg_review" (with a ranking between 
> zero and five stars), we would like to behave differently if the hotel has no 
> reviews (we do not know if it is good) or if it has a review of zero stars 
> (the hotel is bad).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to