[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17677809#comment-17677809
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-16622:
---------------------------------------------
I think all this just shows that our testing is inadequate at the moment. The
periodic benchmarks caught it, but it was there more for performance benchmarks
than such glaring functional regressions. However, it also exposed a problem
with solr-bench: instead of reporting the failed queries as failures, they were
reported as fast queries (problem with exception handling). I'll address that
soon.
> Replicas don't come up active after node restart
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16622
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16622
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.1.1
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2023-01-17 15-03-05.png
>
>
> While benchmarking for performance, we saw a sharp change in the graphs:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16525?focusedCommentId=17676725&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17676725
> Turns out there was a commit (SOLR-16414) that escaped all testing and caused
> a regression where restarted nodes didn't have the replicas coming up as
> active.
> This affects 9.1 release, so opening a new JIRA issue to track it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
