[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17644853#comment-17644853
]
Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-16568:
-------------------------------------
[~gus] be my guest. I don't think its worth it for every low CVE that is fixed
via dependency updates. We haven't done that historically either.
> Update woodstox-core to 6.4.0 to mitigate CVE-2022-40152
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-16568
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16568
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Affects Versions: 9.1
> Reporter: Bill Kidwell
> Assignee: Kevin Risden
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: security
> Fix For: main (10.0), 9.2
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This was brought up on the mailing list here:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/psc4r75o933y22jos4xk5rcwhof48sdw
> The automatically created CVEs against xstream are misleading and read the
> thread above to try to find out more. Its not clear which CVEs if any are
> actually valid.
> The only one that looks still valid against woodstox-core is CVE-2022-40152
> (https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3f7h-mf4q-vrm4) and fixed in
> https://github.com/FasterXML/woodstox/issues/160. It is LOW severity only.
> ----
> Our container scan detects woodstox 6.2.8
> /opt/bitnami/solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/woodstox-core-6.2.8.jar
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org
