dsmiley commented on code in PR #1154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1154#discussion_r1014484618


##########
solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/QueryElevationComponent.java:
##########
@@ -553,6 +560,82 @@ private void setQuery(ResponseBuilder rb, Elevation 
elevation) {
     }
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Updates any filters that have been tagged for exclusion. Filters can be 
tagged for exclusion
+   * via the syntax fq={!tag=t1}field1:value1&elevate.excludeTags=t1 This 
method modifies each
+   * "excluded" filter so that it becomes a boolean OR of the original filter 
with an "include
+   * query" that matches the elevated documents by their IDs. To be clear, the 
"excluded" filters
+   * are not ignored entirely, but rather broadened so that the elevated 
documents are allowed
+   * through.
+   */
+  private void setFilters(ResponseBuilder rb, Elevation elevation) {
+    SolrParams params = rb.req.getParams();
+
+    String tagStr = params.get(QueryElevationParams.ELEVATE_EXCLUDE_TAGS);
+    if (StringUtils.isEmpty(tagStr)) {
+      // the parameter that specifies tags for exclusion was not provided or 
had no value
+      return;
+    }
+
+    List<String> excludeTags = StrUtils.splitSmart(tagStr, ',');
+    excludeTags.removeIf(s -> StringUtils.isBlank(s));
+    if (excludeTags.isEmpty()) {
+      // the parameter that specifies tags for exclusion was provided but the 
tag names were blank
+      return;
+    }
+
+    List<Query> filters = rb.getFilters();
+    if (filters == null || filters.isEmpty()) {
+      // no filters were provided
+      return;
+    }
+
+    Map<?, ?> tagMap = (Map<?, ?>) rb.req.getContext().get("tags");
+    if (tagMap == null) {
+      // no filters were tagged
+      return;
+    }
+
+    // TODO: this code is copied from FacetProcessor#handleFilterExclusions()
+    // duplication could be avoided by placing this code in a common utility 
method, perhaps in
+    // QueryUtils

Review Comment:
   Maybe `ResponseBuilder`.  There is no great place because we don't capture 
this feature into any one class.  RB is mostly a POJO so this method would seem 
quite random there.  But not bad.  I support that.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@solr.apache.org

Reply via email to